British guilty of disguised anti-Semitism, says Israeli minister

Expressing “disappointment” at Prof Hawking’s decision, Mr Steinitz said: “I didn’t hear that Prof Hawking or other British academics, who are so easily boycotting Israel, are boycotting other Middle East countries. Or if they have reservations about America invading Iraq, they so easily boycott American universities. So some Israelis feel that there is some kind of double standards.

“The fact that Israel is treated differently, the fact that some people can say so easily, let’s do something against Israel, let’s boycott Israel, let’s boycott Israeli products, this is some kind of disguised anti-Semitism. In past times people said that they are against the Jews. Now, especially after the Holocaust, nobody says that they are against the Jews, but people are against the Jewish state.”

Mr Steinitz a former finance minister said British perceptions of Israel were more negative than those of other Western or European countries and drew comparison with popular sentiment in the US, Canada and Australia.

“There should not be much difference between people in America, Canada, Britain and Australia,” he said. “[They have] the same language, very similar cultures. And still in America, Canada, in Australia in opinion polls, most citizens support Israel with a very warm feeling. In Britain it is much less.

“When you think that all four are Anglo-Saxon democracies, why should people in America, Australia or Canada have different relations to or appreciations of the minuscule Jewish state than the people of Britain? Just recently, there was a very general poll in the United States. The support for Israel in the United States was stronger than ever. I’m not confident that this is the case with Britain as well.”

Asked if this difference in attitude might be reflected in the Foreign Office or in Government policy, he replied: “This might be the case.”

Anti-Semitism existed in Britain to a “certain extent”, he added, manifesting itself in negative attitudes to the Jewish state.

Widely believed to be Mr Netanyahu’s favoured choice as Israel’s next foreign minister, Mr Steinitz was almost certainly reflecting his boss’s views. One official close to the prime minister has told The Daily Telegraph that Mr Netanyahu views British public opinion towards Israel as “very tough”.

Mr Steinitz insisted that he was not accusing Mr Hague or other British ministers who had criticised Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank of anti-Semitism, saying this was a “legitimate view”.

“Not every kind of criticism is anti-Semitism,” he said. “I didn’t say that any criticism of Israel was anti-Semitic or unfair even. If somebody has some criticism of Israel, this is one thing. The same person can also have some criticism of his own country.

Visit link:
British guilty of disguised anti-Semitism, says Israeli minister

Latest World News – ‘US, Israel want sectarian gap in Iraq’ – Video




Latest World News – 'US, Israel want sectarian gap in Iraq'
http://www.youtube.com/AllNewsPlace All News Place يرجى الاشتراك للحصول على آخر المستجدات مكان الأخبار جميع On Monday, terrorists killed at least 95 people a…

By: All News Place مكان الأخبار جميع

View post:
Latest World News – ‘US, Israel want sectarian gap in Iraq’ – Video

Hezbollah Secretary General says they will side with Israel after Assad falls to prevent Suuni – Video




Hezbollah Secretary General says they will side with Israel after Assad falls to prevent Suuni
pDont worry about the background or at the end, just watch the video and the subtitles. Notice; this was last year. They fear downfall with Assad means end o…

By: Warnewstoday

See the article here:
Hezbollah Secretary General says they will side with Israel after Assad falls to prevent Suuni – Video

Gas discoveries give Israel new regional clout -minister

* Israel hopes gas finds will strengthen diplomatic hand

* Decision on export quotas to be made in a “few weeks”

By Crispian Balmer

TEL AVIV, May 22 (Reuters) – Israel’s newfound natural gas

reserves will boost its regional clout and could help it improve

ties with neighbouring states in need of new energy sources,

Energy Minister Silvan Shalom said.

Once totally dependent on fuel imports, Israel has made the

largest gas discoveries in the world over the past decade off

its Mediterranean coastline, and is expected to become an

Read the original here:
Gas discoveries give Israel new regional clout -minister

Israel and Palestinians Are Still Fighting Over This Iconic Image

JERUSALEM (AP) — A new Israeli report into the death of a Palestinian boy during a fierce gunbattle in the Gaza Strip more than a dozen years ago has reignited an emotional debate over who killed him – and how the incident has shaped perspectives of the Mideast conflict.

Israel says a French TV report in 2000 that claimed Israeli forces killed the boy is misleading, provides no evidence and is part of a smear campaign against the Jewish state. For Palestinians, the case remains a vivid symbol of Israeli oppression and of their own sense of victimhood.

In this Sept. 30, 2000 file image from television, Jamal al-sutra signals his position while protecting his 12-year-old son Mohammed al-Dura, as they shelter behind a barrel from crossfire near Netzarim Jewish settlement in the southern Gaza Strip. More than a dozen years later, the death of a Palestinian boy allegedly shot by Israeli troops in Gaza continues to stir emotions on both sides of the conflict. (AP Photo/France 2, Fille)

The deep feelings surrounding the death of 12-year-old Mohammed al-Dura illustrate how the Israeli-Palestinian conflict goes far beyond the battlefield and is often a high-profile media war as well.

While Israel enjoys an overwhelming military advantage, it is often outclassed in the imagery battle, with the Palestinians portraying themselves as David to Israel’s Goliath. It’s a touchy subject for Israel, which devotes an enormous amount of energy to promote its image to counter what it sees as hostile international opinion.

The France 2 network report aired on Sept. 30, 2000, days after a Palestinian uprising erupted.

The video showed a terrified child and his father, Jalal, cowering in front of a wall during an exchange of fire between Israeli troops and Palestinian gunmen. The father is seen gesturing frantically to try to stop the shooting as the boy screams in terror. The camera then cuts to a shot of the motionless boy slumped in his father’s lap. France 2 blamed Israeli troops for killing the boy.

Israel has long disputed the accusation, and on Sunday it published the 44-page report of its investigation, ordered last year by Israel’s current Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon. It found the TV report misleading and unfairly critical of Israel. It said there was no evidence the boy was shot by Israeli troops or that he was even killed at all, claiming there were no blood marks on the scene or bullet wounds in the alleged victims. It said the boy was shown alive toward the end of raw video it obtained from France 2, but that was not included in the edited TV report.

A man walks past a mural depicting Palestinian Jamal al-Dura and his son Mohammed, allegedly caught in crossfire between Israeli forces and Palestinian police, moments before Mohammed was killed, can be seen at the Place de l’Enfant Martyr de Palestine (square of the Palestinian martyr child) in Bamako, on March 6, 2013. The monument commemorates the September 30, 2000 event, which has since launched a controversy, with some commentators alleging that the incident had been entirely staged. Credit: AFP/Getty Images

Jamal al-Dura (L) and his family, visit the grave of their son Mohammed, at the Bureij cemetery in the central of Gaza Strip, on May 20, 2013. Mohammed died in the arms of his father on September 30, 2000, after being caught in crossfire between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian militants at the start of the second intifada, or uprising. Israel said on May 19, 2013, that a France 2 television report seen worldwide on the death of Mohammed was ‘baseless’, following an analysis of the raw footage. Credit: AFP/Getty Images

Follow this link:
Israel and Palestinians Are Still Fighting Over This Iconic Image

General says Israel poised for war on Syria if Assad falls

By Dan Williams

HERZLIYA, Israel (Reuters) – Israel is poised for a large-scale assault on Syria to prevent advanced weapons reaching jihadi rebels or Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon if President Bashar al-Assad is toppled, Israel’s air force chief said on Wednesday.

But Major-General Amir Eshel, addressing a security conference, said his warplanes could be repelled by Syria’s formidable, Russian-supplied anti-aircraft systems – an implicit censure of Moscow echoed by Israel’s defense minister.

“If Syria collapses tomorrow we could find ourselves very quickly inside this cauldron, and on a very large scale, because this enormous arsenal is parked there, just waiting to be looted, and could be turned (against Israel),” he told the Fisher Institute for Air & Space Studies near Tel Aviv.

“We may find ourselves having to take action, on a very broad scale, within a very short period of time,” Eshel said. “It does not mean we will act, but that we have to be ready to.”

He assumed fighting could escalate to include attacks on Israel by Hezbollah and by Iran, which backs Assad as well as the Lebanese militia, and that the air force may have to employ “the full spectrum of its might”.

Israeli warplanes have struck Syria at least three times this year to destroy what intelligence sources described as advanced anti-aircraft and ground-to-ground missile caches in transit to Hezbollah. The Israelis also worry that Assad may eventually lose control of Syria’s chemical warheads stocks.

Beset by the more than two-year insurgency that Hezbollah been helping his army battle, Assad has not retaliated to Israel’s air strikes. But there are signs his restraint may wane, such as a shooting attack by Syrian troops at an Israeli patrol in the occupied Golan Heights on Tuesday.

MILITARY SUPREMACY

While militarily superior to Syria, a foe with which it had been in a stable standoff for decades, Israel fears this edge will be blunted by Assad’s Russian-made air and coast defenses – especially if Israeli forces are stretched over three fronts.

Continued here:
General says Israel poised for war on Syria if Assad falls

This day in Jewish history / The founder of modern Hasidism dies

News: Diplomacy and Defense | National | World | Middle East | Features | Opinion | Israel weather | Maccabiah 2013

Jewish World: News | Rabbis’ Round Table | The Jewish Thinker Culture: Books | Food and Wine | Arts & Leisure

Haaretz.com Blogs: ASpecial Place in Hell | West of Eden | Diplomania | Routine Emergencies | Jerusalem Vivendi

The Axis | Strenger than Fiction | East Side Story | Modern Manna | The Fifth Question

Haaretz.co.il: | | | | | | | | |

FAQ | Contact us | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Management | Editorial | Employment Opportunities | Advertise on Haaretz.com | Haaretz News Widget

Design by Roni Arie | Accelerated by cotendo

The rest is here:
This day in Jewish history / The founder of modern Hasidism dies

Vatican observer, church scholar Weigel speaks at Bnai Jacob Synagogue

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — George Weigel, a Vatican observer and church scholar during the papacy of John Paul II, spoke at B’nai Jacob Synagogue in Charleston Tuesday about the relationship between Judaism and the Catholic Church.

Weigel, who served as NBC’s on-air commentator during this year’s papal election and transition, said it is important for Catholics and members of the Jewish faith to foster an open dialogue to promote accurate perceptions about both religions.

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — George Weigel, a Vatican observer and church scholar during the papacy of John Paul II, spoke at B’nai Jacob Synagogue in Charleston Tuesday about the relationship between Judaism and the Catholic Church.

Weigel, who served as NBC’s on-air commentator during this year’s papal election and transition, said it is important for Catholics and members of the Jewish faith to foster an open dialogue to promote accurate perceptions about both religions.

“I’m amazed by two things in the 30 years I’ve been involved in intense conversation with Jewish friends,” he said. “One is how little most Christians know about Judaism, despite the fact that we read the Old Testament — the Hebrew bible — and all the Scriptures and songs and other aspects of daily worship. I’m even more amazed sometimes at how little Jews know about Christianity.”

Weigel is the author of “Witness to Hope,” the bestselling biography of Pope John Paul II, and said his many interactions with the former pope taught him that the most formative time in his life was during the German occupation of Poland during World War II. John Paul II, then Karol Jozef Wojtyla, was forced to study in a clandestine underground seminary during the final years of the occupation.

“One of his seminary classmates from the underground seminary in Krakow told me, ‘You have to understand it wasn’t a question of whether you would be alive on your next birthday or the next New Year’s or the next Christmas,’” Weigel said. “The question for five and a half years was, ‘Will I be alive tomorrow?’”

Weigel talked about the relationship of the Catholic Church with other religions worldwide, and said he views the state of Israel as an ally to the U.S. in the Middle East and abroad.

“I think as an American citizen, what I am interested in, and why I have been and continue to be a friend of Israel, is because it is a democracy, and because it is a beacon of aspiration to democratic civility that is really quite remarkable given the pressures of other states since 1947,” he said.

Rabbi Victor Urecki, who has served as rabbi for B’nai Jacob Synagogue since 1986, said Weigel’s visit carried an important message for both Jews and Christians interested in gaining a greater understanding of their faith.

Follow this link:
Vatican observer, church scholar Weigel speaks at Bnai Jacob Synagogue

Op-Ed: One of the Best Hopes for Mideast Peace Just Called it Quits

State 194 is crucial viewing for anyone interested in advancing the cause of Israeli-Palestinian peace. The film is not simply a showcase of Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyads quest to lay the groundwork for a future state of Palestine. By calling attention to the failure of American and Israeli leaders to make serious progress towards peace during Fayyads tenure, which ended abruptly with his resignation just over a month ago, State 194 makes a powerful argument that we need to change course dramatically. And we dont have time to waste.

The film tells the story of Fayyads ambitious state-building plan, launched in 1994, to make the idea of a Palestinian state impose itself on the world. The so-called Fayyad Plan ran under the heading of Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State. Over the following 10 years, it led to an average economic growth of about 10 percent.

The film begins this past November at the United Nations, when the Palestinian Authority sought an upgrade to Palestines status at the UN to gain international recognition as a state. The moving vote sets the stage for films central question: With almost the entire world endorsing Palestinian statehood, where is the Palestinians long-overdue state?

Fayyad admitted prior to that vote that “the reality of the occupation will not change.” And, to the dismay of two-state solution supporters like myself, Fayyads ambitious agenda only achieved one of its two goals. Indeed, it established a de-facto state in which the groundwork exists for a stable Palestinian state. But due to the absence of diplomatic progress, the establishment of Palestine seems further away than it was 10 years ago.

The story State 194 tells is, then, in many ways a tragic one. For years, American and Israeli leaders have complained about the lack of a Palestinian partner for peace, and, when presented with the opportunity to work with a Palestinian politician with a dedication to peace, nonviolence, and two states, those leaders failed to seize it. In one week of December 2012 alone, Netanyahus government announced plans for the construction of 11,000 new homes beyond the Green Line that demarcates Israels pre-1967 borders.

Neither did our American administration do nearly enough to strengthen Fayyads efforts. And unsurprisingly, as the occupation continued amidst Fayyads declarations that state-building could achieve true statehood, his popularity plummeted and his position grew more and more fragile. As Fayyad told New York Times columnist Roger Cohen, We have sustained a doctrinal defeat. We have not delivered. I represent the address for failure. Our people question whether the P.A. can deliver. Meanwhile, Hamas gains recognition and is strengthened.

This behavior, so counterproductive to peace but nonetheless characteristic of repeated Israeli and American administrations, eventually led to Fayyads downfall. On April 13, he stepped down as Prime Minister of the Palestinian Authority. As New York Times Columnist Thomas Friedman so bluntly puts it: Thanks, American Congress and Israeli government. Your mindless, repeated cutoffs of cash to Fayyads government helped undermine the best Palestinian peace partner Israel and the U.S. ever had. Nice job. The Palestinian politician, who has been called a partner for peace for Israel by Shimon Peres, Ehud Olmert, and most recently, a senior Netanyahu advisor, hasnt had much of an opportunity to demonstrate it.

But beyond lamenting the missed opportunity, State 194 asks how we must work to support Fayyads ambitious state-building efforts. As a student advocate for the two-state solution, I continually challenge myself and my peers to learn about the conflict. And, after screening State 194 at Dartmouth College, I know that I and many other students feel a clear understanding of the necessity of bolstering the non-corrupt, economics-focused style of leadership that Fayyad has embodied. The film premiers on May 17th, and I know of no better way to begin to learn about the state of Palestinian leadership than seeing it.

Follow this link:
Op-Ed: One of the Best Hopes for Mideast Peace Just Called it Quits